Accessibility Tools

By carrying out a cohort comparison between 2009 and 2017 we explore if the perception of external quality management changed in a positive or negative direction. The results show that the perception is slightly more positive in 2017 than in 2009. This might indicate that people working in higher education institutions became more familiar with quality work; external changes can be regarded as subordinated and distracting.

 

This paper was presented at EQAF and reflects the views of the named authors only.

By carrying out a cohort comparison between 2009 and 2017 we explore if the perception of external quality management changed in a positive or negative direction. The results show that the perception is slightly more positive in 2017 than in 2009. This might indicate that people working in higher education institutions became more familiar with quality work; external changes can be regarded as subordinated and distracting.

 

This paper was presented at EQAF and reflects the views of the named authors only.

The perception of external quality management in times of change – Finland’s academic landscape as a case example

More related content

Follow EUA