Accessibility Tools

During academic year 2016 KU Leuven set up a trial run in which 15 faculties participated. The aim of this trial run was to evaluate the new method in a systematic way drawing on websurveys focus groups reports and input from an international panel. This allowed us to identify positive elements and points for improvement. In this paper we focus on what we learned from this trial run and how this critical self-evaluation resulted in concrete adaptations for the upcoming quality assurance cycle (COBRA 2.0).

 

This paper was presented at EQAF and reflects the views of the named authors only.

During academic year 2016 KU Leuven set up a trial run in which 15 faculties participated. The aim of this trial run was to evaluate the new method in a systematic way drawing on websurveys focus groups reports and input from an international panel. This allowed us to identify positive elements and points for improvement. In this paper we focus on what we learned from this trial run and how this critical self-evaluation resulted in concrete adaptations for the upcoming quality assurance cycle (COBRA 2.0).

 

This paper was presented at EQAF and reflects the views of the named authors only.

Implementing a new method for quality assurance: the case of COBRA at KU Leuven

Nele Annaert, Maarten Corten, Céline De Vos, Jasper Stockmans, Sofie Vandoninck, Alexandra Verhagen and Andries Verslyppe

More related content

Follow EUA