Accessibility Tools

The results show that the education proposals of 2013 respond better to the assessment requirements of the program approval than those of 2012 but only in relation to the non-academic aspects. Regarding the evaluation added value it is observed that the different stakeholders show agreements but also divergences. Some of these divergences are unavoidable because stakeholders represent different perspectives of quality; others however point the way towards areas for improvement.

 

This paper was presented at EQAF and reflects the views of the named authors only.

The results show that the education proposals of 2013 respond better to the assessment requirements of the program approval than those of 2012 but only in relation to the non-academic aspects. Regarding the evaluation added value it is observed that the different stakeholders show agreements but also divergences. Some of these divergences are unavoidable because stakeholders represent different perspectives of quality; others however point the way towards areas for improvement.

 

This paper was presented at EQAF and reflects the views of the named authors only.

Yes, there is impact. But is it positive, negative or “none of the above”?

The case of Faculty of Sciences and Faculty of Biosciences of the University Autonoma de Barcelona
Anna Prades,Susana Segura, Núria Marzo

More related content

Follow EUA