Accessibility Tools

Both positions are important and contextually right. Thus the presented format provides a gradual framework to bridge the gap between both sides in an interactive and creative process. Both sides are invited to negotiate the best possible result by using an unusual approach for university discussions the benefit analysis method known e.g. from economics. After the negotiating activity it should be obvious that a change of perspective is also helpful if not necessary to create a new or updated study programme. The practiced approach helps as well to recognise which limits for study programme development remain when visionary ideas are measured against reality.

ISSN: 9602

This paper was presented in the form of a workshop at the 2020 European Learning & Teaching Forum and reflects the views of the named authors only.

Both positions are important and contextually right. Thus the presented format provides a gradual framework to bridge the gap between both sides in an interactive and creative process. Both sides are invited to negotiate the best possible result by using an unusual approach for university discussions the benefit analysis method known e.g. from economics. After the negotiating activity it should be obvious that a change of perspective is also helpful if not necessary to create a new or updated study programme. The practiced approach helps as well to recognise which limits for study programme development remain when visionary ideas are measured against reality.

ISSN: 9602

This paper was presented in the form of a workshop at the 2020 European Learning & Teaching Forum and reflects the views of the named authors only.

Study programme development – Building a bridge between tradition and innovation - An unusal approach

More related content

Follow EUA