Accessibility Tools

This extensive study marking 10 years of EUA’s work on university autonomy and more than five years of mapping is a central reference in discussions and analyses of institutional autonomy – both in Europe and beyond.

The report addresses the question of university autonomy in organisational financial staffing and academic matters and compares data for all indicators that constitute EUA’s Autonomy Scorecard. It allows readers to have a full overview of the state of play and of recent developments in each of these fields – assessing the capacity of universities to decide on issues as diverse as tuition fees governance structures recruitments and salaries or language of instruction and student numbers. The report ranks systems for each autonomy dimension in a special Scorecard. It also uncovers trends for each area highlighting improvements and causes for concern.

While some countries have achieved a relatively high degree of university autonomy in all or most of the four dimensions considered the Scorecard helps to recognise that there is no unique model to foster autonomy. Countries scoring high in at least three dimensions include models as diverse as those in Finland Luxembourg Estonia or the UK (England). The report also reveals predominantly a persisting lack of a global view on university autonomy when designing and implementing reforms. In addition the challenging economic context impacts autonomy in different ways beyond financial matters. Finally public authorities are found to exert stronger steering through funding mechanisms while concentration processes such as mergers raise new questions for university autonomy.

 

University Autonomy Online Tool

Related publication: University Autonomy in Europe III: Country Profiles

This extensive study marking 10 years of EUA’s work on university autonomy and more than five years of mapping is a central reference in discussions and analyses of institutional autonomy – both in Europe and beyond.

The report addresses the question of university autonomy in organisational financial staffing and academic matters and compares data for all indicators that constitute EUA’s Autonomy Scorecard. It allows readers to have a full overview of the state of play and of recent developments in each of these fields – assessing the capacity of universities to decide on issues as diverse as tuition fees governance structures recruitments and salaries or language of instruction and student numbers. The report ranks systems for each autonomy dimension in a special Scorecard. It also uncovers trends for each area highlighting improvements and causes for concern.

While some countries have achieved a relatively high degree of university autonomy in all or most of the four dimensions considered the Scorecard helps to recognise that there is no unique model to foster autonomy. Countries scoring high in at least three dimensions include models as diverse as those in Finland Luxembourg Estonia or the UK (England). The report also reveals predominantly a persisting lack of a global view on university autonomy when designing and implementing reforms. In addition the challenging economic context impacts autonomy in different ways beyond financial matters. Finally public authorities are found to exert stronger steering through funding mechanisms while concentration processes such as mergers raise new questions for university autonomy.

 

University Autonomy Online Tool

Related publication: University Autonomy in Europe III: Country Profiles

University Autonomy in Europe III: The Scorecard 2017

More related content

Follow EUA