Student-centered and active learning are a necessity for European universities to remain relevant to young people and society. Cecilia Christersson and Patricia Staaf of Malmö University discuss the need for further European collaboration in education, as well as in research on education and active learning.
All universities face challenges such as widening participation, more diverse student populations, and digitalisation, which all lead to the need to further develop pedagogical methods and ways of understanding the role of higher education in society.
At Malmö University (MAU) in Sweden, there is a clear aim to attract a non-traditional student population and to promote a cross-disciplinary base in order to address societal challenges and propose solutions. This is done, among other things, through student-centered pedagogy and societal engagement. We call this challenge-based learning.
Challenge-based learning is both a method of approach and an application of pedagogical methods and is understood as an attitude towards learning that sees students as partners and the research process as a model for learning. The goal is to activate learning through curiosity and authentic challenges. Other aspects of challenge-based learning are addressing, developing and evaluating academic transferable skills; and integrating both research and collaboration with society in the educational programmes. The challenges that MAU is tackling are getting students more involved and engaged in the development of challenge-based learning and encouraging teaching staff to explore new learning-driven co-creative processes. The discussions with the EUA Learning & Teaching Thematic Peer Group on “Promoting active learning in universities” have given us inspiration and new ideas on how to deal with these challenges.
As part of our work in the group, we discussed ways to promote and enhance active learning in universities, with active learning understood as an approach to learning that exceeds purely pedagogical concerns, and also activates the societal mission and function of higher education. During the vivid discussions, we touched upon most aspects of higher education like professional development for teachers, collaboration with stakeholders, learning environments, assessment practices, curriculum design, and the need forlearning communities.
The group decided not to give one single definition of active learning but to embrace the need for different universities to profile their understanding of active learning. The main result of the discussions was the conclusion that there is a need for a cultural shift in higher education to enable innovative (re)design processes for the improvement of curriculum development, teaching approaches, as well as of the learning environment. This re-design of higher education should include students as partners. Universities also need to embrace and expand the concept of active learning by appreciating their position as part of learning communities.
A cultural shift may sound like a revolution, but it is more like a transformative process that needs to advance in small steps, with the possibility of experimentation and failure as an opportunity to learn. The different steps toward such a shift are further developed in our group’s report.
In addition to these outcomes, there is a distinct need for research on the development of learning and teaching in higher education to identify best practices, and to understand what works and why. International cooperation is key as such collaboration in the field of learning and teaching is also a powerful way to strengthen internationalisation.
Coming from Sweden, where there are no fees for higher education (apart from those for students who come from outside the EU), it was a valuable reminder of how different the prerequisites for higher education are within Europe, which emphasises the importance of strategies to deepen collaboration in research-integrated education between European universities.
It is imperative for higher education institutions to keep focusing on the quality, as well as the interplay in learning and teaching, in order to remain a relevant option for young people and their commitment to education and lifelong learning. Building networks and engaging in peer-learning activities are a crucial way for institutions to achieve this, but also to enhance their ability to influence relevant policies both at the European and national levels.
Cecilia Christersson and Patricia Staaf were the co-chairs of EUA’s Learning & Teaching Thematic Peer Group on “Promoting active learning in universities”.
“Expert Voices” is an online platform featuring original commentary and analysis on the higher education and research sector in Europe. It offers EUA experts, members and partners the opportunity to share their expertise and perspectives in an interactive and flexible exchange on key topics in the field.
All views expressed in these articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of EUA.
The University of Jyväskylä in Finland is redefining the role of language and communication skills in curriculum development and aiming to educate multilingual academic professionals. A university-wide strategic development plan creates a completely new, multilingual structure for language and communication studies. As Marja-Leena Laakso and Peppi Taalas tell us, this brings together different languages and combines content and language expertise in the curriculum design.Read more
Research-based education is happening in Europe, but there are clear challenges with how it is defined and understood. Bjørn Stensaker from the University of Oslo breaks down the topic and makes some proposals on how to truly unite research and education.Read more
As discussions are underway at the European Learning & Teaching Forum, EUA’s Tia Loukkola gives an overview of the extensive work taking place in the field, including reports, lessons learnt by EUA members and what the Bologna Process can bring to the field.Read more
A higher education institution’s graduates reflect the achievement of intended learning outcomes as well as successful learning and teaching practices. Jurgita Vizgirdaite from the Kaunas University of Technology discusses challenges in the assessment of learning outcomes and shares recommendations and good practices from her university.Read more
The relationship between higher education institutions and society, as well as between learning and teaching, is evolving. This is driven by the changing ways in which students learn, different types of interaction in the classroom, and continuous adaptation to new developments and research. Romiță Iucu from the University of Bucharest examines this evolution in higher education and advocates for a new academic professional identity to transform careers.Read more
Higher education institutions have been and are investing in finding a better balance between the valorisation of teaching and research. The example of KU Leuven, in Belgium, shows that even though an institution puts a lot of effort in honouring teaching in an appreciative way, it may not be experienced that way by the academics. Saartje Creten, an educational developer at the university, explains why engaging with other European higher education institutions on these matters proves that, while investing in the valorisation of teaching at the institutional level is indispensable, it is complementary and useful to look into the topic beyond the boundaries of one’s own institution.Read more
The need to better professionalise academic teaching careers is now on the agenda of more and more universities in Europe. Iwona Maciejowska from Jagiellonian University explains why these universities face many challenges and offers a proposal on the first steps to take.Read more